Thailand: deadline for Facebook to remove ‘illicit’ content passes

The federal government threatened Facebook a week ago with law suit unless of course it removed 131 illicit pages by 10am local time on Tuesday morning

Thai internet providers appear at first sight pressurized to instantly shut lower use of Facebook like a deadline lapsed for that social networking giant to get rid of content, including posts critical from the monarchy.

The federal government threatened Facebook last week with law suit unless of course it removed 131 illicit pages by 10am local time morning.

However, the Bangkok Post reported the Thai Isp Association (Tispa) might also disconnect use of Facebooks servers.

It reported an e-mail purportedly sent from Tispa towards the md of Facebook Thailand warning when the organization doesn’t remove all 131 pages, concerned government bodies will ask that we shut lower accessibility site.

This course of action may modify the entire delivery services of world wide web.facebook.com to customers in Thailand, Tispa stated within the email, according towards the Bangkok Publish.

The Protector was not able to instantly corroborate the report. Facebook was still being available in Thailand following the deadline.

A Facebook spokesperson stated it reviews demands by governments to limit use of content.

Whenever we receive this type of request, we evaluate it to find out whether it puts us on notice of illegal content. When we determine it does, only then do we allow it to be unavailable within the relevant country or territory and inform individuals who attempt to can get on why it’s restricted, the spokesperson stated.

The Thai government hasn’t openly released information on which posts it wants removed.
Several images along with a video appearing to exhibit the 64-year-old Thai monarch putting on a crop top and covered in ornate tattoos happen to be printed on social networking in the past couple of days.

Facebook, which opened up a workplace in Thailand in 2015, may be the greatest social networking in the united states.

The military-run administration briefly cut use of Facebook after it launched a coup dtat on 22 May 22, 2014.

The royalist junta has dramatically ramped up online censorship, especially any posts or comment perceived to violate the countrys strict lse majest laws and regulations, meaning royal insult.

Sensitivity to public critique of royal matters was increased following the much-loved former king died in October and the boy, Maha Vajiralongkorn, required power.

With every offence punishable by as much as fifteen years in prison, greater than 105 charges happen to be elevated throughout the juntas tenure, a number of them associated with discussing online posts.

Lse majest laws and regulations pressure media operating in Thailand to frequently self-censor.

Find out more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/16/thailand-deadline-for-facebook-to-remove-illicit-content-passes

The post Thailand: deadline for Facebook to remove ‘illicit’ content passes appeared first on Technology.

Woke models: how activism became fashion’s latest must-have

Its no longer enough to have a look. Adwoa Aboah and Leomie Andersons socially aware voices have made them the stars of the new catwalk generation

You can tell a lot about an era by its fashion models. In the 60s, the spirit of the youthquake was personified by the wide-eyed, Bambi-limbed Twiggy. In the early 90s, nothing said sod the recession like a glamazon who wouldnt get out of bed for less than $10,000. In the ensuing two decades, Kate Moss represented not just a waifish appearance but a sphinx-like attitude, espousing the motto: Never complain, never explain.

But in the social media era, something new is happening. In the age of protest and fourth-wave feminism, it is no longer enough for models to slink down a catwalk anonymously: silence is starting to look seriously dclass. The hot thing in modelling is not a look, but a viewpoint. It is having a voice and not being afraid to use it. It is TED talks and open letters. It is Instagramming pictures from protest marches and hosting debates about intersectionality. It is campaigning for charities and founding NGOs. It is outspoken. It is woke.

Socially conscious models are popping up everywhere. On the current covers of i-D and Love magazines is Adwoa Aboah, a woman whose relatively small stature (5ft 8in) has done nothing to thwart her towering success. As well as appearing on catwalks and campaigns for Dior and Versus Versace, Aboah runs an initiative called Gurlstalk; her Instagram page intersperses backstage fashion show photographs with moving posts on her struggle with depression.

Many of Aboahs contemporaries equally refuse to conform to the archetype of the taciturn model. In both Love and i-D, Aboah appears with Slick Woods, a spliff-smoking 20-year-old based in New York who said in a recent interview: Im definitely an out-of-pocket pick for a model. I say what I want and do what I want.

With
With social media, we all have voices and opinions Leomie Anderson, modelling one of her hoodies Photograph: PR company handout

British model Leomie Anderson runs a website that publishes articles by women (a recent one was titled: What does Brexit mean for women and marginalised communities?) and sells clothing with empowering slogans. One of her hoodies, with This p***y grabs back on it, was worn by Rihanna on the New York Womens March in January. Last month, during a Q&A at a Mayfair-based pop-up womens space to mark International Womens Day, Anderson argued that outspoken models are helping change the fashion industry from the inside out: When I was younger I was told, Modelling is going to be harder for you because youre black, and I just accepted it, she said. Now, with social media, we all have voices and opinions. Before, if it wasnt on the news, who was talking about it?

Of course, this is not the first time that models have taken a stance in the 90s, Naomi Campbell and Cindy Crawford said they would rather go naked than wear fur but back then only a handful of models spoke out, and only once they were famous. Now, speaking out can bolster your career.

Many pinpoint the genesis of this trend to a 2013 TED talk by Cameron Russell, in which the Prada and Victorias Secret model skewered the fashion industry for its lack of diversity and argued that her success was part of a legacy of gender and racial oppression. If Russell had made a similar comment backstage at a fashion show where a models traditional job is to quietly bend to the will of designers and stylists you wonder if she would have worked again. Instead, she has flourished: the TED talk has been viewed more than 17m times, and Russell has become a Vogue cover star and a campaigner for sustainability in fashion. Her website has a page devoted to recruiting other models to become activists.

It could be argued that the rise of the socially conscious model reflects a very 2017 archetype: the woke young woman, who looks set to define femininity this decade in the same way that the lager-swilling ladette did in the 90s. It is also symptomatic of a broader cultural awokening that has reached the stuffiest institutions; even the royal family has recently relaxed its upper lip.

Adwoa
Adwoa Aboah at the Burberry show during London fashion week, February 2017. Photograph: Mike Marsland/WireImage

If models represent a fantasised ideal of women, it is telling that until recently most have been seen and not heard. In the mid-19th century, when they first appeared, they were known as mannequins and were professionally silent, according to Caroline Evans, professor of fashion history at Central Saint Martins. They were haughty and glassy-eyed right from the beginning, she says, recalling a 1920 anecdote where the designer Paul Poiret told an interviewer, while surrounded by models: Do not talk to the girls, madame, they do not exist.

Since then, dozens of models have found fame, but few for their opinions. Beverly Johnson, the first African American woman to appear on the cover of US Vogue in 1974, was a proto-model activist. Not by choice but by circumstance, she says. I was 22 years old and I wasnt looking for such a serious responsibility, but it was placed on me and I had to respect and honour it. I was interviewed by the New York Times and Time magazine and I had a platform, she says. Ive seen both sides of the industry. When I look back on it, there were horrible times. Times when guys were hitting on you, you would go to the agency for protection and realise you were alone, as well as the race thing.

Beverly
Beverly Johnson on the cover of US Vogue, August 1974. Photograph: Conde Nast

However, Johnson feels that the representation of women in fashion has not seen a linear improvement, and that in some ways modelling was more progressive in her day than now. The late 80s and early 90s saw peak model power, when a supermodels fee was as central to her brand as her waist-hip ratio and the most famous quote to be attributed to a model Linda Evangelistas I dont get out of bed for less than $10,000 was coined.

What followed in the mid-90s can be seen as the industrys reaction to the power the supermodels held over it: Prada ushered in a trend for very thin, white models (the influential Italian megabrand famously did not have a single model of colour on its catwalks for 15 years), often scouting very young women from the previously untapped eastern Europe. Few became famous and rates fell drastically. The dearth of models of colour has been described as a visual neo-colonialism, part of a shift inside the industry that veteran casting agent James Scully attributes to a cabal of stylists and casting directors who, he says, dont like women and go out of their way to prove it on a daily basis.

According to Scully, the rise of the fashion industrys most damaging impulses can be causally related to the lack of models power. Models have got thinner, for example, he says, partially because in the 1980s and 1990s, girls were bigger, and designers would remake the dress if they gained a few pounds. Now, they would just get rid of her.

Social media has given models a voice just when they need it most. On set, Ive spoken up for myself, when a hair stylist has not been equipped to work with my texture of hair, says Calvin Klein model Ebonee Davis, and got a backlash. Theres an assumption that Im a diva, an angry black woman. Davis is one of many models who has taken the conversation online. Last summer, she wrote the industry an open letter. Fashion, the gatekeeper of cool, decides and dictates what is beautiful and acceptable, she wrote. And let me tell you, it is no longer acceptable for us to revel in black culture with no regard for the struggles facing the black community. She later delivered a passionate TED talk arguing that the lack of value for black lives in the fashion industry is the same lack of value that leads to black people being gunned down in the street.

The fear of losing work did cross my mind, she says, but I felt that it was my duty, my responsibility, to tell the truth. That far overshadowed any doubts, because what I have to say is valuable. There are so many young black women who have experienced lack of self-esteem and feeling inadequate. As someone with a platform and with a voice, I have to stand up and use it.

Ebonee
Ebonee Davis giving a TED talk. Photograph: TED

Daviss Instagram feed combines shots of her bathing in waterfalls in a bikini with videos of her interviewing homeless war veterans; she is comfortable with the idea that being outspoken is part of her personal brand. The same is true of many of todays burgeoning models, who have come of age in a climate in which the most successful celebrities Victoria Beckham, Kim Kardashian are multi-faceted one-woman businesses. Scully says that some models have shifted from muse to marketing machine. The models at the top of the tree such as Gigi Hadid, who has 31.7 million Instagram followers dont simply model; brands fall over themselves to find novel ways to reach her followers, commissioning her to design clothes and photograph campaigns.

It makes sense that being outspoken would be aspirational in 2017, when writing a thinky Instagram post can be a route to free media coverage. Hadid is frequently celebrated as a truth-teller, even though a clear-eyed appraisal of her interviews and Instagram posts would suggest that she plays it pretty safe. She did march against Trumps Muslim ban, and she has briefly alluded to her Palestinian heritage, but most of the activity that helped propel her to fame has not been genuinely contentious. She was much praised for writing open letters in response to online body shaming on social media, a topic that positions her as the underdog while enabling the media to run many pictures of her much-discussed imperfections, which, it must be said, are incredibly difficult to see with the naked eye.

There is nothing simple about being a successful outspoken model; the road to enlightenment is paved with discarded cans of Pepsi, as Kendall Jenner knows. Jenner is one of the few Insta-models who has retained an almost Moss-like silence for most of her career, despite growing up in front of the cameras as one of the stars of Keeping Up With the Kardashians. Her recent debacle of a Pepsi advert an attempt to sell fizzy pop by aping a symbolic moment from the Black Lives Matter movement is a clear example of the pitfalls of a brand trying, and failing, to be woke. Jenner has so far kept shtum about the damaging media storm that followed, as well as further controversy after she appeared on a recent cover of Indian Vogue. The jury is out on whether her reticence on the matter has done her brand more harm than good.

Halima
Halima Aden models for Max Mara at Milan fashion week, February 2017. Photograph: Pietro D’aprano/Getty Images

Just weeks before the Pepsi furore, Karlie Kloss a top model whose Instagram feed is peppered with concern about coral reefs came similarly unstuck after dressing as a geisha for a photoshoot that ran, ironically enough, in US Vogues diversity issue. Andersons defence of Kloss suggests that a models influence can only go so far: People attack Karlie Kloss, but as a model she had no say in what the editorial would be, she says. Thats the wrong person. You dont always see a moodboard beforehand. You need to find out who the editor was, who commissioned it. Attacking the wrong people is never going to affect change.

Still, Scully believes the power balance is shifting and that social media has helped to extend the careers of some models that the industry was ready to toss away. Models have campaigned for better treatment in the industry, and have won media coverage that could convince brands to take more care of them; Donald Trumps modelling agency closed after model Maggie Rizer and others publicly denounced the boss. Models speaking out about racism and ageism and body fascism has piled pressure on the industry to become more inclusive. From Halima Aden appearing at Milan fashion week as the first hijab-wearing top model to the use of septuagenarian stars in underwear campaigns, societys interpretation of what constitutes beauty is starting to look just a little more inclusive.

Beyond these small victories, however, you have to wonder if model-activism has a purpose beyond personal brand-building, and if the glut of photographs of models reading Simone de Beauvoir in the bath currently clogging the internet is doing much to further the feminist cause. Clearly, it is dispiriting that while young people contribute to an atmosphere in which protest and activism are fashionable, it was the over-65s who put Trump in the White House and won the Brexit vote. Still, for those of us who lived through the ladette years, and the time of Female Chauvinist Pigs, there is a little jolt of joy to be found in the fact that, right now, most models wouldnt get out of bed for less than the empowerment of marginalised groups.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2017/may/15/woke-models-how-activism-became-fashions-latest-must-have

Dont rejoice in Brexit failings. We remoaners must shape the future | Zoe Williams

Celebrating your enemys hubris might be fun, nevertheless its additionally a distraction from building strong publish-EU alliances

The moment of clearness self-loathing swinging pendulum-style into self-forgiveness came as i was studying ComputerWeekly.com. This isn’t my regular browsing material. I’m not sufficiently thinking about computers to want a quarterly bulletin. Id arrived via Twitter, directed by someone most likely like me metropolitan remoaner, also uninterested in computers for that headline: Almost three-quarters of tech workers thinking of leaving the UK after Brexit.

Apparent negative effects of Brexit the weakling pound, the mind drain, the pointless, gargantuan cost, the clumsy, gaffer-recorded shanty town set to exchange the EUs architecture, master ball pain of happening holiday having a exaggerated navy passport fill me with harsh delight. I track them just like a new hobby: national-catastrophe-bird-watching.

It’s partially I-told-you-so. It’s partially relief that, however much lazy, airy, neo-imperialist insouciance abounds, real-existence actions have real-existence, observable effects. It’s partially outrage in the injustice, that the campaign built on falsehood narrowly convinced the country to sign an empty sheet of paper, where its leaders now write whatever nonsense pleases them. Gina Miller said at the weekend: I am not anti-Brexit, Im anti-lies. Im anti-both indeed, I believe the 2 are indivisible. Although it could have been easy to develop a situation for leave without laying, it is not what went down, and it might be needlessly generous to split up the end result in the actions.

And it is partially that dissent never felt a bigger factor than when Theresa May commanded it cease. It’s partially just funny: each fresh disaster a satirical, faintly surreal release in the determined humourlessness from the march to Brexit. The Spanish people might have an intoxicating compound noun of these impulses, but our nation has overwhelmingly spoken. We do not need anymore of the words, or at best, less than they require ours.

It has to prevent. It might be the Brexiters who shot us within the feet, but were the same body politic and well all have the same discomfort. We can’t rejoice within their chaos and failure simultaneously as building constructive, publish-EU, pan-European alliances, any greater than a person can whistle and cry simultaneously they will use different muscles, the main one gates from the other.

When Jean-Claude Juncker and May have a falling-out, to disregard his part within the sorry affair while disapproving in our prime ministers conduct is wrong. It is not because its unpatriotic I applaud the triumph of sense over nationalism but since it is idle. He doesnt embody important values anymore than she does: any tact, any compromise, any maturity, any urgent look after the people whose lives this posturing will affect.

Juncker could be the enemy of the enemy, but he’s also her mirror: self-importance may be the primary quality he gives bear with an issue where the self couldnt be less important. Let alone the optics of allying having a technocrat upon your national interest: fretting about appearances feels rather noughties, nowadays, like fretting in regards to a manifesto in publish-manifesto politics. It’s a discursive backwater to enjoy Mays unpreparedness, her puffed-up anti-diplomacy. It holds all of us within an adversarial limbo, where we are able to simply be surpassed by occasions rather than succeed of these.

Sooner or later, companies around the continent and individuals within the United kingdom, people whose supply chains usually have complemented one anothers, individuals who rely on each other, are likely to start clamouring for additional adult leadership than We drink all your prosecco. So ner. Eventually and demonstrably sooner, as with at this time mix-border police force needs a cooperative system that won’t just approximate but better what weve had so far.

The cyber-attack on NHS computer systems is really a fine stay with beat the Conservatives with persistent underfunding scotched any hope of the modernisation that may have avoided it. Yet given that we’re one of greater than 100 countries affected, the only real significant lesson this is actually the emergency of creating new structures to pool worldwide expertise.

Basically we wring our hands concerning the rush of far-right politics here and in america, were neglecting to study from Europes resilience into it not only the electoral defeat of extremists in Austria, France and also the Netherlands, however the creative new left of Spains Podemos and Denmarks The Alternative. Its as though our domestic trouble is really intoxicating to all of us, its arguments so compelling, that people cannot look beyond it to help make the connections would need if were ever likely to create some publish-EU internationalism.

Possibly that sounds defeatist, allowing Brexit to become a formality with no obvious feeling of how destructive it will likely be. But even though you allow it to be your campaign for parliament or even better, the folks to obtain the final say within the deal when its finally thrashed out, you must have built the systems, had the conversations, refined the minds and scoped the options for what you would like rather of whatever desultory document is defined before us.

Inside a surprise move, 72 hours prior to the French election, the Greek firebrand Yanis Varoufakis came out in support of the centrist Emmanuel Macron. It had been a surprise because Macron means much that Varoufakis specifically abhors work market deregulation, decrease in wealth taxes. As well as their bond originated from an unpredicted twist of eurozone history Macron, billed like a staunch supporter from the troika and it is knowledge, was the only real politician to lobby in Greeces favour from the imposition of austerity measures. He was overruled through the then French president Franois Hollande, who, like a noted socialist, should have been receiving Greeces side, but ultimately preferred the security to be on Angela Merkels.

The lesson here isn’t that everyone has to knuckle lower and pay a new centrism, as based on whatever photogenic hotshot the world delivers. Rather, its that typically to consider critically and creatively in regards to a problem, be it Greek debt or Britains world, you have to forget are you going to youre on. You have to turn from entrenched variations and focus on common causes. You have to stop searching inwards for your opponents, and begin searching outwards for allies.

Find out more: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/15/dont-rejoice-brexit-failings-remoaners-shape-future

The post Dont rejoice in Brexit failings. We remoaners must shape the future | Zoe Williams appeared first on Technology.

Trump is deleting climate change, one site at a time

The administration has actually taken a hatchet to environment modification language throughout federal government sites. Here are numerous of the more outright examples

https://interactive.guim.co.uk/libs/iframe-messenger/iframeMessenger.js

During inauguration day on 20 January, as Donald Trump was including American carnage to the governmental lexicon, the brand-new administration likewise took a hammer to main acknowledgment that environment modification presents a risk and exists to the United States.

One of the starkest modifications to the White Houses site following Trumps presumption of workplace was the ditching of a whole area on environment modification, packed with charts on renewable resource development and photos of Barack Obama looking at shriveling glaciers, to be changed by a perfunctory page entitled An America very first energy strategy .

https://interactive.guim.co.uk/libs/iframe-messenger/iframeMessenger.js
https://interactive.guim.co.uk/libs/iframe-messenger/iframeMessenger.js https://interactive.guim.co.uk/libs/iframe-messenger/iframeMessenger.js https://interactive.guim.co.uk/libs/iframe-messenger/iframeMessenger.js https://interactive.guim.co.uk/libs/iframe-messenger/iframeMessenger.js https://interactive.guim.co.uk/libs/iframe-messenger/iframeMessenger.js The placeholder picture of the EPAs environment modification web page pre-Trump administration. Photo: EPA

These modifications have actually triggered deep alarm amongst ecological groups and some researchers, who fear that tweaked online language might quickly change into reams of environment information being erased. While the record-keeping guidelines of the EPA and other firms require that information is kept, there is little to stop the administration concealing it from public view, just to be gotten by means of flexibility of info laws.

Groups such as DataRefuge and the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative( EDGI )have actually swung into action to keep an eye on and archive environment and other information, simply in case. EDGI utilizes a group of volunteer experts to track modifications to around 25,000 pages throughout numerous federal government firms.

Maya Anjur-Dietrich, member of EDGIs site tracking committee, stated the effort has actually observed numerous emerging patterns, which significantly issue environment modification and renewable resource.

Across numerous firm sites, we have actually seen a decrease in use of terms like environment modification and greenhouse gases, and a total decrease in access to info referring to environment modification, she stated.

In a couple of cases, we have actually likewise observed shifts in economy-and business-oriented language, where the descriptions of the workplace focuses have actually increased their points out of assisting to grow facilities, develop tasks, and promote the economy.

On specific DOE(Department of Energy)pages, in specific, we have actually seen a shift in focus far from renewable resource and, sometimes, to use of nonrenewable fuel sources.

Anjur-Dietrich mentioned that federal government sites have actually constantly been frequently upgraded, either throughout an administration or its shift. Unless care is taken, broad, crucial styles such as environment modification can end up being obscured.

It is when websites are altered without openness, description, or mindful documents that the general publics access to info and hence the capability to comprehend the ramifications of that details is endangered, she stated.

Activists have actually looked for to reanimate gotten rid of details through the so-called Beetlejuice arrangement, which is where 3 different liberty of details ask for the exact same thing needs the material to be openly shown.

The Beetlejuice method has actually been utilized on a variety of firms consisting of Nasa and the EPA for environment information, renewable resource info and other material. Scientist fret that alters to online generalities focused on the general public might eventually grow to end up being hazard to their work.

Its a severe issue that we will lose this info since long-lasting, massive ecological information is really tough to come by, stated Stuart Pimm, an ecologist at Duke University who sent among the liberty of info demands.

At this phase its a worry I have not had associates stating they attempted to get information and its not there. This has actually to be seen in the context of an administration thats really hostile to science. I imply, we have a president who has actually stated environment modification is a Chinese plot.

Amy Atwood, a senior lawyer at the Center for Biological Diversity, included: Scrubbing info about environment modification will not make it any less harmful.

Were going to combat the Trump administrations efforts

to bury the science revealing the hazardous effects of environment modification at every turn.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/14/donald-trump-climate-change-mentions-government-websites